I would rather consider a study on the ratio of home appliances, mainly routers and computers, that have been tapered with -- from a large and representative sa

I would rather consider a study on the ratio of home appliances, mainly routers and computers, that have been tapered with -- from a large and representative sample. I would measure actual damages, intent and describe insulting an infant as a “careless prank” without giving much more detail. I would probably focus my angle on security updates, and consider practices: namely, what was said higher up about parents being tired and most likely sensitive to simpler authentification protocol. I would actually like to investigate why so many people are dubious of updates. > miasma of implications I’m not sure that tone applies. An infant has bare social skills, little idea of property beyond holding and no lasting memory; it is therefore far less sensitive to the threat of ‘hacking’ than its parents. I don’t see any miasma in “implying” (nota: I was being careful because you come off as very anal) that it was used as a symbol of frailty that needs protected — a symbol that only makes sense in an inappropriate physical interpretation of the event. Then again: You were the one asking why that title could be seen as inappropriate. Could. I answered that. I didn’t claim my answer was purely objective: interpreting representativity never entirely is. I will now remember not to answer questions you ask, certainly in a way that could possibly change your position: you obviously don’t like that. In a related concern: why the f-ck is someone so bigoted doing on HackerNews?