3 ms·
DHH's article looks to be titled 'Test-induced design damage', not 'TDD is dead'. 'TDD is dead' is referenced in the article as a current uprising (which I hadn
by Shebanator 12y ago
DHH's article looks to be titled 'Test-induced design damage', not 'TDD is dead'. 'TDD is dead' is referenced in the article as a current uprising (which I hadn't heard of, fwiw), not necessarily as something DHH personally believes. I thought his take on the issue was nuanced and thoughtful, so its surprising to see Kent's overreaction here.
- djur 12y ago"TDD is dead. Long live testing."[1] [1]: http://david.heinemeierhansson.com/2014/tdd-is-dead-long-live-testing.html http://david.heinemeierhansson.com/2014/tdd-is-dead-long-liv...