4 ms·
Data-viz rant ... There's a word cloud about halfway down the post that shows words frequently used in comments on "rumor" posts. Words that are darkly shaded
by jawns 13y ago
Data-viz rant ...
There's a word cloud about halfway down the post that shows words frequently used in comments on "rumor" posts. Words that are darkly shaded are associated with true rumors, and words that are lightly shaded are associated with false rumors.
I've never been into word clouds as a data visualization tool, but if you do use a word cloud, and you're using color to communicate something relevant about the data, PLEASE do not use a monochrome gray gradient, as this post has done. It's really difficult to tell whether "government" is slightly darker or lighter than "certainly," for instance.
A blue-red gradient would have worked a lot nicer in this case, in my humble opinion.
- deaneckles 13y agoI don't like word clouds either (and I'm one of the authors!). You'll notice there is no cloud in the actual paper, just in the blog post. Do you have any references about human perception of blue-red versus monochrome gradients? Would be interested to have good recommendations for such cases.
- endersshadow 13y agoI'm not GP, but the problem, in my colorblind opinion, is not the hue of the gradient. The extremes of your gradient are way too close together. Nothing really stands out. At least with blue/red, you can make it one extreme or the other (as opposed to white or black...on a white background). That said, once they got to purple, I'd barely be able to distinguish them, anyway.
- hfsktr 13y agoMy first thought when they mentioned it was the optical illusion where the color looks different because of the colors around it[0]. Maybe having distinct colors (red/blue) would help with that. [0] Bad at explaining so an image: http://i.imgur.com/oyWO4IP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oyWO4IP.jpg
- 1wheel 13y agoRobert Simmon has a good intro to color perception for data visualization http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/elegantfigures/2013/08/05/subtleties-of-color-part-1-of-6/ http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/elegantfigures/2013/0... . Cynthia Brewer's work is currently the gold standard http://colorbrewer2.org/ http://colorbrewer2.org/ https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/891359/files/25713244/download?wrap=1 https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/891359/files/25713244/download...
- pygy_ 13y agoHijacking the thread, since you're around: Regarding the last graph, the observed data looks like it matches a log-normal distribution, not a power law... Is this correct? Not sure how to interpret it, though. How did you compute your estimation?
- deaneckles 13y agoI think log-normal distributions usually fit this kind of data as well as power laws do. Anyway, such a plot is not the best way to choose between those two models (see http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1062 http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1062). We don't actually do any such test in the paper though (or say that it is a power law or log-normal). You might want to check out the paper for more details. https://www.facebook.com/publications/244240069095667/ https://www.facebook.com/publications/244240069095667/