3 ms·
I'd agree that Go's language syntax and symantics are very simple at this point. I'm really hoping they improve some of these simple use cases with Go2 wheneve
by kyrra 13y ago
I'd agree that Go's language syntax and symantics are very simple at this point. I'm really hoping they improve some of these simple use cases with Go2 whenever that comes about.
What I really like is the whole toolchain that comes with it. Fast compile times, cross-compiling, static binaries for easy deployment, gofmt, godoc, gocode, etc.
- pjmlp 13y ago> What I really like is the whole toolchain that comes with it. Fast compile times, cross-compiling, static binaries for easy deployment, gofmt, godoc, gocode, etc. If it also had an OS coded in it, it would be called Oberon (1992).
- 0xdeadbeefbabe 13y agoThe name Oberon would be easier to google too. An alarming number of false positives taught me to search for "golang" instead. A small baseline level of alarm is good when you are programming in go for obvious reasons, including {}interface etc.