3 ms·
I don't think that the point at which the mail is diverted is the issue here. The article leads me to believe that the USPS took issue with mass-unsubscribing
by garrettgrimsley 12y ago
I don't think that the point at which the mail is diverted is the issue here.
The article leads me to believe that the USPS took issue with mass-unsubscribing from junk-mail, not with having mail diverted before reaching the addressee.
- Spooky23 12y agoThe article was written from the POV of the guy who blew through alot of investor money on an idea that wasn't really thought through. The USPS has a legal obligation to provide universal service to every physical address. They unsuccessfully tried to hack around it, while ignoring the multitude of solutions available to do so in a real (but perhaps inconvenient to them) way.