4 ms·

I think you're just agreeing with him. Arch will stop functioning seemingly 'just because' unless you're an expert who knows everything that goes on in his syst

• pritambaral 12y ago
  > unless you're an expert who knows everything that goes on in his system. I'm saying that this is a prerequisite for Arch. It is not supposed to be or marketed as "for non-experts", quite the contrary. I'm not disagreeing with his point that Arch shouldn't be used in production. I'm disagreeing with his: 1) Expectation that maintenance (of an Arch Linux system) should be hands-free; and 2) Arch breaks inexplicably, almost insinuating that Arch breaks on purpose. > Is that what you want to hear? I do not like the "tone" of this line. Pray tell, what are you trying to imply? Aside: It would be great if downvotes came with explanations.