3 ms·
You can also logically partition these beasts into multiple real servers. Who needs a hypervisor when you can have 96 "real" servers sharing the same hardware?
by huslage 12y ago
You can also logically partition these beasts into multiple real servers. Who needs a hypervisor when you can have 96 "real" servers sharing the same hardware?
- sp332 12y agoMemory bandwidth would be a nightmare, not to mention every other kind of I/O.
- mzs 12y agoThere are some tricks for IO: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/redp5065.html http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/redp5065.htm...
- mikeash 12y agoPardon my ignorance: what's the difference between using a hypervisor and running "real" servers that share hardware?