4 ms·
I'm very suspicious about this astronomical performance difference you're talking about. Like many I run both firefox and chrome all day long. I literally can
by zobzu 13y ago
I'm very suspicious about this astronomical performance difference you're talking about.
Like many I run both firefox and chrome all day long.
I literally cannot tell which one is faster.
Firefox does use all the cores like Chrome does btw - it's called multithreading - and both of them seem to do approximately an equal okay-ish job at it (maybe servo does a much better job but thats not useable yet).
The only times where as a user i can see chrome multiprocess model shines is:
- sec vulns where chrome sandbox is not bypassed
- stuff actually crashing or hanging
Needless to say both cases are quite rare on either browser (and when flash hangs in firefox, it does for a few seconds before firefox proposes to kill it - while in chrome it only hangs the current tab)
Note also that:
- electrolysis can be enabled right now by an about:config option
- i run firefox and chromium on linux - i guess your mileage may vary on other platforms (?)
- fragmede 13y agoCurious - do you run ad-block or any other blocking-type add-ons? On my system, there's a noticeable speed difference between Firefox and Chrome, especially if I disable ad-block in Firefox. (Also on Linux.)
- itry 13y agoWhen I do calculations in the browser, opening a second window halves the performance in the first window in FF. In Chrome the performance stays the same.