But in the end, clang and llvm may got some contributions back to the open source project, that will benefit everybody.. If not now.. its very common that the

But in the end, clang and llvm may got some contributions back to the open source project, that will benefit everybody.. If not now.. its very common that the project dont get the traction they are expecting.. and then they just open it up to at least get some good marketing of it.. Theres also the whole net effect.. hiring people to get to know a open source project.. that can contribute back to it, or get hired by someone else that do contribute back.. I think in the end, open source with BSD/MIT licenses are likely to have better results for the open source project as a whole.. I think GNU make a lot of sense when stallman give birth to it.. because the software "ecosystem" was very brutal about openness back than.. it required strong leadership and actions.. i think it makes less sense nowadays.. you know.. even microsoft are opening their stuff!! I think we need to think now more about open data, because there a lot of sensitive stuff behind black boxes and paywalls..