> as in, within a few seconds of her pushing her own commit Is it really only possible for a revert to happen 'within a few seconds' to not cause issues? That'

> as in, within a few seconds of her pushing her own commit Is it really only possible for a revert to happen 'within a few seconds' to not cause issues? That's a strong statement to make based on little information. It might be true, but the repository in question could also have little traffic, or this could have happened over a weekend. > Also, the article says they reviewed git push logs, which I imagine would catch this. I see. I guess overlooked that (probably just read it as 'commit logs'). In general, I don't understand why they didn't just ask her about the commits in question. If it did happen, she would likely be able to point them in the right direction and at least narrow their search (e.g. 'the revert happened in repository X around these dates'). If she couldn't, then they are no better off, but no worse off either.