3 ms·

Actually the investigation found problems with the way they treated a range of other employees. Also, you ignored the part about them not being able to find an

• glesica 13y ago
  Where does it say that? It says he and his wife encouraged other employees to work on her startup, but it says nothing about the other findings relating to a "range of other employees".
• antihero 13y ago
  git push --force Though I'd assume they did more in depth investigations than just looking at the commit history, what with being a company that literally makes a living out of git.
  • kevinchen 13y ago
    That only works if you reverted the commits almost immediately after they are pushed. With a distributed system like Git, Horvath certainly would've noticed, and anyone who pulled before the revert would've known too.
  • vulf 13y ago
    > commit history, push log, and all issues and pull requests A force push will still show up in the log. Issues and PRs aren't deletable, so that lends a bit of credibility to this. Sure, said engineer probably has access to erase the push log and delete the issues or PRs directly from the database, but parties involved would likely still have email notifications related to it.
• glesica 13y ago
  The git history wasn't her most "concrete" charge of sexism. Your attitude demonstrates that you have no idea what sexism is. Her most "concrete" charge of sexism was the charge that Theresa Preston-Werner, with her husband's consent (tacit or otherwise) emotionally tormented her. And that charge appears to have been confirmed.
  • deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]