I agree strongly with this message. There is a lot more to web design than making a page "pretty". Wikipedias design is good; and certainly too good to justify

I agree strongly with this message. There is a lot more to web design than making a page "pretty". Wikipedias design is good; and certainly too good to justify a complete design overhaul. The biggest problem I have with it is the unclear visual hierarchy: there are links which are context dependent (changes depending on which article you're viewing) next to links which always link to the same page. And the list of languages the article is available in would benefit from listing the most viewed (or last used) versions before the full alphabetical listing.