4 ms·
Of course that argument only applies when talking about the standard real number system. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.3018.pdf?origin=publication_detail http://ar
by GregBuchholz 13y ago
Of course that argument only applies when talking about the standard real number system.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.3018.pdf?origin=publication_detail http://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.3018.pdf?origin=publication_detail
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.0164.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.0164.pdf
...of course you can make a pretty good case that uncountable, uncomputable, unnameable, unknowable "real" numbers don't exist.
http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0404335 http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0404335
...(the impatient should jump to chapter 5). And maybe also:
http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~norman/views2.htm http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~norman/views2.htm