I also like the implication that scientists (you know, that wonderfully cohesive and homogeneous group of people who all share an agenda and a single world view

I also like the implication that scientists (you know, that wonderfully cohesive and homogeneous group of people who all share an agenda and a single world view) have nothing better to do than attempting to take over Hollywood's movie production. If anything, I think most of the bad science (as described in the comments of the article) comes from not talking to real scientists enough. Good (or bad) recent example: "Knowing", where Nicholas Cage manages to play a scientist without resembling a scientist in any way, shape or form, as though nobody involved with the production had ever met a real, live scientist before.