4 ms·
As it appears to be wireless I would imagine the latency between head movement to camera movement and then video capture to video output would likely be enough
by mambodog 12y ago
As it appears to be wireless I would imagine the latency between head movement to camera movement and then video capture to video output would likely be enough to make users feel ill.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- gojomo 12y agoPerhaps, but it won't be long before omnidirectional arrays of cameras have all perspectives available even before you turn your head.
- ohadron 12y agoWireless 2.4ghz radio latency is measured in milliseconds which is quick enough not to notice. Latency also depends on how quick the gimbal servos are but that too may be quick enough.
- cvbncvbncgbc 12y agoSince the movement and change of speed of the copter isn't very fast you can apply time warp to this; or just make the camera film in 120 fps.
- baddox 12y agoThe camera movement latency is probably quite noticeable. With a brushless gimbal this could be greatly reduced. The 5.8 GHz video transmission setup is widely used for FPV flying, and its latency is negligible. Video showing the reaction speed of brushless gimbals: http://youtu.be/Dr5CnIA52zY http://youtu.be/Dr5CnIA52zY