"procedural reasons" actually means respecting human rights. He's pleaded guilty for misdemeanor. If you have some complaint about that, fix the police who shat

"procedural reasons" actually means respecting human rights. He's pleaded guilty for misdemeanor. If you have some complaint about that, fix the police who shat on the procedure, denying a victim a probably well-deserved day in court. I can't believe everybody is pounding on the company board, when the real scandal is that the police destroyed such an important procedure. With a felony he would have automatically been removed, and nobody would be mobbing on someone who's legally only a petty criminal. Moreover, there is still this issue that justice is not about taking revenge on someone, but protecting society. There is, for example, the trouble that he twitted that he's innocent after pleading guilty, and that's a real problem for someone in a position of power, he's got a reality perception problem, combined with a tendency for violent domination I guess there is a big risk and he should probably be removed. But not in a mob attack and not based on illegal evidence.