3 ms·
Argument: (In order of how persuasive I found the argument) 1. "There was no argumentation why cacert should have been included initially." 2. No
by dfc 13y ago
Argument: (In order of how persuasive I found the argument)
1. "There was no argumentation why cacert should have been included
initially."
2. No audit of CACert's process and infrastructure.
3. Mozilla and FreeBSD have had previous discussions and decided CACert
was unacceptable. (reliance-on/agreement-with)
4. Questionable license.