The difference is that absent a cell doing what Szotack claims (i.e. evolving in front of him) his theory is basically unprovable and unfalsifiable. The other g

The difference is that absent a cell doing what Szotack claims (i.e. evolving in front of him) his theory is basically unprovable and unfalsifiable. The other group stand a chance of eventually reconstructing what they're looking for, but the alternative being presented is just pontification.