4 ms·
It's hilarious that you're implying it's hard to understand that the guy with the server password has can read everything. I mean, really? The entire point of
by etchalon 13y ago
It's hilarious that you're implying it's hard to understand that the guy with the server password has can read everything. I mean, really?
The entire point of my protest to this change is specifically to stop either myself, or any member of management team from having a "technologically privilege position".
Your arguments about SaaS are irrelevant and juvenile. Just cause Atlasssian, or any SaaS provider, has access doesn't mean I, or my management team, should.
Saying "well we run our email server in house so we just solve this problem with a policy" is fine.
- teacup50 13y agoSo you're OK with SaaS being protected by policy, but not the behavior of your own company's executive staff and delegated administrators? Hardly seems irrelevant to me, and the free pass you give to SaaS is nonsensical and hypocritical.
- etchalon 13y agoYou're either being purposeful dense or you have an agenda.
- teacup50 13y agoWhereas you appear to be simply dense given your inability to see the hilarious hypocrisy of surrendering the privacy of yourself and others to SaaS vendor policies while calling them to task for giving you the equivalent privilege of policy choice.