3 ms·
As a former AMZN'er I find that hard to believe. The company is cheap - it's in the bones. There is no way the company would ever agree to give more of it's l
by ryanobjc 12y ago
As a former AMZN'er I find that hard to believe.
The company is cheap - it's in the bones. There is no way the company would ever agree to give more of it's loot over to employees if it wasn't forced to via regulation.
Now, Google's "GSU" programme does have an adjustment that is based on company, personal and stock performance via a magical formula that only HR/management knows.
- hiddencost 12y agoSee my response to the other responder for further specification. I'm an extremely questionable source. Amazon's "Frugal" was certainly everywhere, which is why I remember being surprised by seeing those terms in the performance bonuses.