I went back to read the article twice more after seeing your comment, but I'm failing to understand how you interpreted this piece as an assertion of superiorit

I went back to read the article twice more after seeing your comment, but I'm failing to understand how you interpreted this piece as an assertion of superiority. I don't see anyone (neither the owner nor author) trying to dictate status. The only assertion being made is that eating alone doesn't deserve the stigma it currently has in society.