>You are following the assumption that there would be 50/50 proportions of interest (and therefore skill, and therefore employment) No I'm not. I never said an

>You are following the assumption that there would be 50/50 proportions of interest (and therefore skill, and therefore employment) No I'm not. I never said any such thing. Perhaps a non-sexist distribution would be 80:20 male:female. You can still compare that to the actual distribution and see how they compare. Your first question is: "if there is a gender divide" but how can you possibly answer that if you don't look at the actual numbers?