7 ms·
Codebabes.com | Learn Coding and Web Development the Fun Way
- choult 12y agoPlease note, I am posting this with despair - it's little surprise that women are under-represented in our industry if this kind of thing can stand.
- robin_reala 12y agoIt’s just… what can you even say? Someone not only thought this was a good idea (which is bad enough) but then went ahead and actually built it.
- porker 12y agoAnd even worse - will most likely make money from it.
- porker 12y ago100% agree. This is offensive and sexist. I'm a man and I'm offended, and can only imagine how women must find it.
- roshansingh 12y agoEven I felt the same. How insensitive people have become!
- PedroBatista 12y agoAnd porn degrades women right? Why are you offended? Do you really think this is a serious website? maybe the next Codecademy. On a lighter note, its really funny how you think "women must find it" offensive, but not for a single second you even thought that same statement is really really sexist. ps: About the website, on my scale between love it and hate it, its in the "who gives a f*?" category. Daytime television if full of this cheesy type of stuff.
- porker 12y ago> And porn degrades women right? Yes. > On a lighter note, its really funny how you think "women must find it" offensive, but not for a single second you even thought that same statement is really really sexist. I am aware, I spent 10 minutes before posting trying to find a way to phrase it without sounding like that. Either I removed it entirely and sounded without empathy, or I left it in and sounded patronising. What would be an improved way to say it? I'm listening and I would like to learn.
- asavi 12y agoYou can just say it's offensive. Qualifying it with your gender is the opposite of what you want to do.
- thanatropism 12y ago> What would be an improved way to say it? Not say it. Don't just assume you know the experience of the Other because you read some Tumblr blogs.
- cbtacy 12y agoyou're what? 14? seriously... it's time for all little boys to grow the fk up.
- cdumler 12y agoI am a man. I find it offensive, too. To everyone else: sure sex sells in plenty of areas of society. It doesn't need to be in technical training.
- pyalot2 12y agoI find it offensive as well. But people are entitled to their free speech, so jabbering on about it is pretty much pointless. But if you like decency enforced by fiat, you could always move to Russia or NK...
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- weland 12y agoI know this is likely an unpopular opinion but here it goes: what the fuck does this have to do with under-representation in our industry? There's medical-themed porn, school-themed porn and I'm sure someone in Japan has made at least one hacking-themed porn movie until now. That doesn't stop women from becoming doctors, going to school or hacking. There are striptease-themed news, too, and that doesn't prevent women going into television. Is the site ridiculous and tasteless? Definitely. It's also not implying that women are lifeless beautiful objects who can't program any more than cheerleading implies that women are lifeless beautiful objects who suck at sports or strip clubs imply that women are lifeless beautiful objects who are only good at dancing. Would you also object to women at your favourite strip club wearing Tux bras? Yeah, it's a piece of thrash, but also not more relevant to our industry than teasenews.com is to journalism.
- pxlbryn 12y agoThe problem for me is that my wife is constantly trying to get into programming. The industry is already gender-biased enough. If she thinks that this is the kind of thing that programmers want - she's going to be turned off from continuing down that path.
- PedroBatista 12y agoMaybe your wife is much more intelligent than you think. Maybe she is not an impressionable toddler and can laugh at both the ridiculousness of this site and your reaction to it. :)
- weland 12y agoMine complained they don't have a version with male hotties, too. FML.
- ohbuttheydo 12y agohttp://codedicks.com/ http://codedicks.com/
- petercooper 12y ago
- maybe 12y agoOh no
- youngtaff 12y agoWTF? As an industry are we incapable of learning anything from our past fuckups?
- rjknight 12y agoOh dear. Not again.
- seanccox 12y agoThis is the definition of (s)exploitation. Apologies for reacting without reading clearly.
- KhalilK 12y agoDid you even read his comment; that is the first text block beneath the comment box? Here it is in case you get lost: Please note, I am posting this with despair - it's little surprise that women are under-represented in our industry if this kind of thing can stand.
- kylemaxwell 12y agoSee choult's comment - no reason to attribute the site to the poster.
- choult 12y agoI'd suggest reading my comment first: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7646303 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7646303
- seanccox 12y agoMany apologies. I sat through a conversation last night, the gist of which was, 'Women are not exploited by the tech industry'. I didn't turn on my brain, and reacted. I'm sorry, Choult. Thanks for directing my attention to your comment.
- xutopia 12y agoWhat the fuck? Do we really need this?
- alinajaf 12y agoThis is surely satire? I refuse to believe that they're actually doing this seriously.
- beaker52 12y agoI think it's real: https://www.youtube.com/user/CodeBabes https://www.youtube.com/user/CodeBabes
- ddd1600 12y agoIn its defense this is for college kids. Also I like it that they've explained "the cloud" as "server farms that some MBA douche decided to rename". Come on this funny
- malditojavi 12y agoAny idea who is behind this? Cause definitly this is made for making money.
- pxlbryn 12y agoThis is why we can't have nice things... It's hard to believe that anyone in this industry - after everything that's gone down in recent years - would be ignorant enough to create this. There's a direct link in "Our Philosophy" to http://programming-motherfucker.com/ http://programming-motherfucker.com/ (which also seems terribly misguided) but I really hope - for Zed's sake - that he's not involved in this idiotic project. I guess they're winning though, if they got on the front page of HN.
- rjknight 12y agoIt's actually not that hard to believe that, out of tens of thousands of people (or more?) world-wide with the capability to build something like this, there's at least one person who actually would do it. That's the problem with trolling - one person can offend thousands of people at a time!
- dragonwriter 12y ago> It's hard to believe that anyone in this industry - after everything that's gone down in recent years - would be ignorant enough to create this. It's very easy to believe that someone with knowledge of this industry would believe that there is an audience for this, and its not surprising that someone in this industry would think that profiting from targeting such an audience is a good (for them) thing to do. There's nothing about either the technical or business side of this industry that should give any reason to think that, whatever they might know factually, people in this industry in any capacity are somehow especially more socially responsible (as opposed to narrowly self-interested) than the rest of the population. Even if you believe that people in our industry are unusually intelligent on average, there's no reason to think there's a particularly strong correlation between intelligence and any particular moral orientation (though, for some reason, people seem to want to believe that "intelligent" implies "shares my values".)
- petercooper 12y agoIt has to be a joke, right? The video on the subscription page sounds like a total parody of an elevator pitch: https://codebabes.com/user/register?destination=subscription https://codebabes.com/user/register?destination=subscription .. "leveraging sexual desire" .. having a woman take off an item of clothing each time you pass a quiz? If this had come out April 1st, it would have easily passed as a creative April Fools joke.
- bowlofpetunias 12y agoIt's definitely tasteless, but for once, despite the theme, it has little to do with our industry, and actually very little with sexism unless you take the radical view that women should never be portrait in such a way. There's a fundamental difference between exploiting one aspect of women and bringing that exploitation where it doesn't belong or basing your entire attitude towards women on that one aspect. This is just soft porn under a domain name that ends with "babes.com". Most of us are okay with the existence of such things (and that's an understatement), and somebody was bound to exploit this predominantly mail target audience. It's just too bad it's now being associated with our industry when we really don't need that shit. But please don't make this part of the narrative around the very real problem of sexism in our industry. This is just a red herring, and maybe just a troll.
- nidx 12y agoThe PHP Virgin QUIZ is full of wrong answers! 1. To run PHP code it needs to be processed by a web server. They say TRUE. The answer is FALSE. - php-cli is used a lot (composer/phpunit/etc...) 2. If you inspect the source of a web page, will you ever see the PHP code? They Say YES. The Answer is FALSE - I mean maybe if you enable phps (php source) in your web server, but in most usage never. 4.In the following code snippet, 'print' is what? <?php print("Hello beautiful world!"); ?> They say it s a variable. That might be true given that a variable can be a closure function, but the real answer is a function! UGH!
- Altreus 12y agoFalse. print is a language construct http://uk1.php.net/manual/en/function.print.php http://uk1.php.net/manual/en/function.print.php
- jcmurrayii 12y ago+1 - oddly enough, my first thought in reading someone's report on the 'incorrectness' of their answers, and yet, adding to the misinformation. Hint: any php 'function' that can be called without parens, is a language construct. Some of our favorite impostor 'functions' in php: echo, unset, isset, die, include, require
- amoliski_ 12y agoSo... almost every quiz is bugged and says correct answers are wrong. And then there's > Which of the following will increment a the variable 'x' by one? * x++ * x+1 * x+=1 * All of the above
- glenra 12y agoThe CSS Virgin Quiz includes a question about Justin Timberlake and this True/False assertion: "The Big Lebowski is the perfect movie." I suspect all the quizzes are jokes or proof-of-concept placeholders.
- HellaMedusa 12y agoFemale developer here! I feel like this has to be click bait, right? No one is seriously positing this site as a serious way to learn to code. Right? "So how did you get into development, Mr. Job Candidate?" "It all started when I successfully completed every fap session at Codebabes.com..."
- fortyseven 12y agoI suppose it might give one a leg up if they were applying for a job as webmaster for a porn site.
- thebiglebrewski 12y agoRIP your inbox...haha jk. Seriously though, this thing sucks...
- siegecraft 12y agoThey're just disrupting the established programming education institutions. Why all the hand-wringing?
- ew 12y agoSome of the answers in the quizzes are deliberately wrong... interesting, purposely making it frustrating so people subscribe to skip.
- alxjrvs 12y agoI am not going to speak for everyone. Porn isn't inherently bad, although the porn industry has a tendency to be incredibly manipulative and harmful to women. This, however, is technical training. This says that programmers are people who want to look at models who are dressed like some board-driven abstract costume aimed to give straight 14 year olds get an erection. It says that programmers are male, and "men like babes", so therefore, men might want this. This is harmful to our culture. This is harmful to women programmers, who now have further proof that they don't 'belong' here, that programming is 'for' them. This devalues what people think of me, and what I consider to be my craft. This is C- misogynist garbage aimed at my community, and I don't fucking appreciate it.
- Altreus 12y agoThis site and I share a very strong link. Apparently neither of us consider PHP to be programming.
- dang 12y agoAll: this post was killed by user flags. Although it seems like an elaborate troll, we've unkilled the post so those who find the discussion productive can continue it. We're killing other posts from this domain as duplicates.
- dashr 12y agoFYI: Its a Drupal7 site hosted on new jersey linode so they can't really be php haters - maybe self-haterz. Using TypeKit. Sophisticated enough to include a custom server header and a California specific Privacy Policy but a UK one (although it could be copied). Video by Wistia. -- HEADERS -- Server The Codebabes server -- Traceroute -- 8 router3-fmt.linode.com (65.49.10.218) 14.891 ms 9.519 ms 14.410 ms 9 li679-236.members.linode.com (23.239.1.236) 10.002 ms 9.691 ms 9.229 ms ----
- areis 12y agoI love the part where they teach about how ints and floats are primitives in JS. And that the answer to "In programming lingo what word means to put two things together?" is "Love" (after the first video).
- pikachu_is_cool 12y agoI can't believe this is actually upsetting people.... it's just a softcore porn site that's coding themed. That's it.
- glenra 12y agoThe first CSS video says "the property and value are separated by a colon (which she pronounces "colin") as the head of some guy shows up in that position, then the narrator says "no, not that Colin". I don't recognize the guy, but I'm really bad at recognizing celebrities. Who is that face, and is he somebody who would be well-recognized in the UK? Direct link to the relevant video snippet: http://youtu.be/HFmaW5WYxe0?t=1m1s http://youtu.be/HFmaW5WYxe0?t=1m1s
- underwater 12y agoThat's Colin Powell (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Powell http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Powell).