4 ms·
I don't understand this post. The first part seems to be justifying why there are more men in the computer field with some pseudo-science. But then he goes on t
by zimbatm 13y ago
I don't understand this post. The first part seems to be justifying why there are more men in the computer field with some pseudo-science. But then he goes on to amend himself and proposes solutions to the problem. All this is very ambiguous to me.
- rjknight 13y agoIt's almost like situations involving humans might be complicated, or something.
- unwind 13y agoAn accurate description of a problem is not an unreasonable first step to take in trying to solve it. You make it sound as if the article "proves" why it has to be the way it is, to motivate doing nothing. That's not what I think it's trying to do.
- zimbatm 13y agoI don't see the connection between the first and the second part. What's the point of establishing a baseline if it's not going to be used to find a solution ?