The core of the Citizens United decision was that becoming a member of a group (ie: Corporation) did not abrogate individual rights. The implication is that gro

The core of the Citizens United decision was that becoming a member of a group (ie: Corporation) did not abrogate individual rights. The implication is that groups of people have the exact same rights as individuals. I think there needs to be a corollary in terms of responsibility. Of course, the entire raison d'etre of modern corporations is to indemnify the members against responsibility for the actions of the group.