3 ms·
I am surprised AT&T left the comment section open in their Public Policy Blog that this Comcast response links to: http://www.attpublicpolicy.com/consumers-2/w
by clavalle 13y ago
I am surprised AT&T left the comment section open in their Public Policy Blog that this Comcast response links to: http://www.attpublicpolicy.com/consumers-2/who-should-pay-for-netflix/ http://www.attpublicpolicy.com/consumers-2/who-should-pay-fo...
They get raked over the coals (and rightly so, IMHO), by people pointing out that they already pay for their bandwidth, so why should they pay twice (once through AT&T and once through the costs Netflix would have to pass through to them).
It really seems like AT&T and Comcast are complaining that people are actually starting to demand the full service that they pay for. It is really hard to take that argument seriously.
- hanley 13y agoLooks like Comcast left their comment section open too, although you have to scroll past the 2 large paragraphs of legal matters to get to the comments. I thought it was interesting that they have more legal content than actual content on the post.
- zxexz 13y agoFunny - it now appears that there are 0 comments on the Comcast page.
- ncallaway 13y agoIt appears the comments are moderated. I attempted to post a comment and it's now in the moderation queue. Presumably "0 comments" is simply the number of comments that portray Comcast in a reasonable light?
- pdonis 13y ago> you have to scroll past the 2 large paragraphs of legal matters Yeah, I love the fact that the boilerplate disclaimers are well over twice the length of the actual post.