4 ms·
The emails seem like fairly good evidence for criminal misconduct, but I am not a court nor a lawyer.
by bagels 13y ago
The emails seem like fairly good evidence for criminal misconduct, but I am not a court nor a lawyer.
- DannyBee 13y agoErrr, what criminal law do you believe it violates?
- mullingitover 13y agoObstruction of justice? The emails explicitly state that the planning should be taken offline, presumably to thwart any future investigation.
- vacri 13y agoSo every divorce case where one party tries to conceal something should end in a prison term?
- DannyBee 13y agoObstruction of justice (which is not actually a single thing, really) generally deals with doing this when there is an investigation in progress. See http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34303.pdf http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34303.pdf for more details of the federal statutes. Anticipatory obstruction is kind of a possible thing under SOX, but otherwise, no.
- bagels 13y agoAny one of the numerous federal antitrust laws that prohibit collusive behavior, such as the Sherman Act. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Litigation#Department_of_Justice_Antitrust_Action http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Li... Section 2 describes it as a felony.