> Why is that news?? It's not exactly news but it's nice to see it broken down in a cohesive way. > Because the article assumes or implies the conclusion that

> Why is that news?? It's not exactly news but it's nice to see it broken down in a cohesive way. > Because the article assumes or implies the conclusion that there are a huge number of vulnerable Rails apps. I think the article quite clearly indicates where all data points came from (Hakiri Facets) and then analyzes them. There is a post scriptum at the end that encourages readers to not evaluate their or any other projects based on the number of CVE vulnerabilities and goes into detail why it's not always a great idea.