Wow. Just wow. I cannot believe the WSJ was tricked into thinking this was a legitimate business. First of all, the design of the page is hideous. Very CPU

Wow. Just wow. I cannot believe the WSJ was tricked into thinking this was a legitimate business. First of all, the design of the page is hideous. Very CPU intensive as well. The text blurbs at the bottom are very poorly written. Secondly, the main goal seems to be selling the O1-3 service to entrepreneurs, not funding them. Further, if you look on the investors section, they have copied and pasted PGs essay on starting a company in a recession verbatim, though they do credit him. This is by no means a comprehensive list of all the red flags telling me the company is not legit. I am amazed the WSJ fell for this. I suppose next week we will be hearing about all the free iPods waiting to be won, and how people can make millions just by posting a link on Google.