Healthcare is free if not heavily subsidized in much of the world already. And there is no reason such a technology would be more expensive than existing health

Healthcare is free if not heavily subsidized in much of the world already. And there is no reason such a technology would be more expensive than existing health care. But why am I even bothering to say this. You're literally arguing it's bad to save people's lives or advance medicine. Even if it really did only benefit rich people, so what? Rich people dying doesn't benefit poor people in any significant way. See zero-sum bias (http://lesswrong.com/lw/2gd/fight_zerosum_bias/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/2gd/fight_zerosum_bias/). "I want to see rich people suffer" rather than "I want to see poor people benefit."