3 ms·

Paying people to pursue an education but they must work for a set number of years for the government or the business that funded their education after they grad

Paying people to pursue an education but they must work for a set number of years for the government or the business that funded their education after they graduate?

Justen 12y ago
Sounds close to indentured servitude.
- Crito 12y ago
  It is already done in some restricted cases; I have a civilian buddy who still owes the Navy a few more years of work to repay his education. He has described it as indentured servitude. Technically he could quit and pay back the Navy, but they've been paying him so poorly that doing so would plunge him into debt.
- imgabe 12y ago
  And it's different from borrowing hundreds of thousands of dollars that can't be discharged in bankruptcy how?
  - deleted 12y ago
    [deleted]
Crito 12y ago
Or just the first part. Educated residents are beneficial to society, even if they are not working directly for the government. Furthermore, it is not obvious to me that the government has a use for all the the graduates of all the majors anyway; maybe the State of Tennessee could use a few hundred developers to work on sites and services that are provided/run by the state, but could they find work for all the CS graduates that universities in Tennessee can pump out? Society will value those peoples' skills, so their degrees are not worthless in any meaningful respect, but governments only need so many people in that profession. Maybe you could still hire them and have them do busywork, but that would just be an unnecessary waste of resources that would leave a bad gap in those people's resumes.
- humanrebar 12y ago
  > Educated residents are beneficial to society, even if they are not working directly for the government. In aggregate, maybe. In every case? Certainly not. Spending six figures for someone to get a Ph.d. in Esperanto doesn't seem beneficial to society to me.

3 ms·

Paying people to pursue an education but they must work for a set number of years for the government or the business that funded their education after they grad

by moistgorilla 12y ago

Paying people to pursue an education but they must work for a set number of years for the government or the business that funded their education after they graduate?

Justen 12y ago
Sounds close to indentured servitude.
- Crito 12y ago
  It is already done in some restricted cases; I have a civilian buddy who still owes the Navy a few more years of work to repay his education. He has described it as indentured servitude. Technically he could quit and pay back the Navy, but they've been paying him so poorly that doing so would plunge him into debt.
- imgabe 12y ago
  And it's different from borrowing hundreds of thousands of dollars that can't be discharged in bankruptcy how?
  - deleted 12y ago
    [deleted]
Crito 12y ago
Or just the first part. Educated residents are beneficial to society, even if they are not working directly for the government. Furthermore, it is not obvious to me that the government has a use for all the the graduates of all the majors anyway; maybe the State of Tennessee could use a few hundred developers to work on sites and services that are provided/run by the state, but could they find work for all the CS graduates that universities in Tennessee can pump out? Society will value those peoples' skills, so their degrees are not worthless in any meaningful respect, but governments only need so many people in that profession. Maybe you could still hire them and have them do busywork, but that would just be an unnecessary waste of resources that would leave a bad gap in those people's resumes.
- humanrebar 12y ago
  > Educated residents are beneficial to society, even if they are not working directly for the government. In aggregate, maybe. In every case? Certainly not. Spending six figures for someone to get a Ph.d. in Esperanto doesn't seem beneficial to society to me.