3 ms·
Not unless RedHat is willing to foot the bill for FIPS certification of a variant, or wait for someone else to do it. The LibreSSL folks have indicated that th
by rst 13y ago
Not unless RedHat is willing to foot the bill for FIPS certification of a variant, or wait for someone else to do it. The LibreSSL folks have indicated that they won't stand in the way of anyone who wants to do that (in this very note!). It just won't be them.
BTW, even some core OpenSSL developers think that the FIPS validation process is worse than useless. Here's OpenSSL developer Steve Marquess arguing that a FIPS-validated version of something will generally be less secure than the non-validated version (citing, in particular, how delays and cost of recertification can prevent deployment of fixes for known bugs):
http://veridicalsystems.com/blog/secure-or-compliant-pick-one/ http://veridicalsystems.com/blog/secure-or-compliant-pick-on...
But OpenSSL, as an organization, has so far been willing to play along with the process anyway. The difference is that the LibreSSL folks have enough of the courage of their convictions that they are not playing along.
- tssva 13y agoRedhat already foots the bill for certification of the OpenSSL library they ship. They also foot the bill to have the versions of OpenSSH, dm-crypt, the kernel crypto api and libgcrypt certified.