5 ms·

I mean in the sense that Github found no wrong doing. Regardless of the fact that she quit, and the co-founder left. If you really believe Github investigation

I mean in the sense that Github found no wrong doing. Regardless of the fact that she quit, and the co-founder left. If you really believe Github investigation was lackluster, that's probably another discussion. My point is simply that the post is inherently sexist, favoring the assumption of wrongdoing rather then a discussion or argument against Github's reasoning/investigation.

Guvante 12y ago
> If you really believe Github investigation was lackluster It doesn't matter if I believe. All I am saying is that the posters could have seen that evidence and used it as their basis. You can't tell a company that already investigated a problem to investigate it again, it would be fruitless. Cutting ties is basically your only choice. > favoring the assumption of wrongdoing rather then a discussion or argument against Github's reasoning/investigation. I repeat my last point. They can't ask Github to investigate something they investigated. It cannot create different results. The problems pointed out are systematic, it isn't like repeating the process will magically remove those problems and find a different result.