2 ms·
That's kind of the point of tweets, "leaving a bigger trail" in the minds of people who read them than IRC messages (that can be said and then vanish away in th
by nnq 13y ago
That's kind of the point of tweets, "leaving a bigger trail" in the minds of people who read them than IRC messages (that can be said and then vanish away in the sea of chatter or get swallowed by the low signal/noise ration never even getting to be read). By actually having to subscribe to someone be notified of the tweets you increase your signal to noise ratio and you tend to actually read most of the messages and most importantly to share them in a different way than just throwing them away to drown in the sea of noise of a chatroom.
Now, to have this bigger "social/communications/memes trail" you also have a bigger digital trail that can be used to find and target people, but you need to pay a price for anything.
To me IRC has always been an instant-messaging and conferencing tool and I never understood how people could have communities in that chaos or even use it for things like technical discussions and project management. That's what mail groups were for back in the day (and still are, thank god!).
- SixSigma 13y agoI mean for spying tools. The C&C is much easier with IRC, just have keyword triggers. You don't have to have all the hassle of the Twitter API, IRC is just a byte stream. As for the wider IRC. I've not found it a problem then again I've been in channel for nearly 20 years. My client is in channel 24/7 so you only miss as much as you want to. OTOH in that time I've gone from icq -> MSN -> googletalk -> facebook chat. As IM support comes and goes from the big players as they get bored with it. The only thing that's changed in IRC in that time is SSL transport.