3 ms·
To me it ultimately boils down to fairness and having a sense of "being in this together". A very good example to me is the firefighter mentioned in the article
by hoggle 12y ago
To me it ultimately boils down to fairness and having a sense of "being in this together". A very good example to me is the firefighter mentioned in the article, he probably does a much more productive job (saving lives) than someone like myself who might get lucky in playing the entrepreneurial / technologist bootstrapping game by striking it rich with some cost-reducing / profit-boosting tool-building. Alas, it's problematic to make these kind of comparisons though (you could argue some tool saves even more lifes, etc).
The "smells" of extreme ideology..
In any case I still believe it's fair to try to spread the wealth more evenly as you and I couldn't even build stuff without the solid framework of society.
I answered your question somewhat in another comment in this article's thread:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7628811 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7628811
- xrange 12y agoCan you give us a Swedish perspective on the Wallenberg family? Who apparently "In the 1990s indirectly controlled a third of Swedish GNP." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallenberg_family http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallenberg_family
- hoggle 12y agoSorry, I'm actually from Austria I don't really know anything about that, interesting though.