3 ms·
Yes, I have to fight with that diagonal divider as well. Here's what I see: When the mouse is not on the screen, you see 2 pages, both with some important info
by Holbein 12y ago
Yes, I have to fight with that diagonal divider as well.
Here's what I see: When the mouse is not on the screen, you see 2 pages, both with some important infos missing (which is a usability disaster).
Only once you move the mouse to one of those two areas, a stuttery animation with z-buffer flickering issues enlarges that area somewhat to show all relevant info.
Pages further down in the navigation order look bad, because the diagonal divider cross the navigation list, and some of the background images in mouse-not-on-the-screen state are behind the navigation, and since they have the same brightness level, the navigation is difficult to read.
The screen order includes a splash page. This is bad design because the user has no options where to go next. The button icon to proceed is also misleading: it's a round button with a down arrow.
Very particular.
- bradbatt 12y agoThe main problem is it takes some amount of time to figure out how to navigate. It should just be inherent. The webmaster needs a copy of Steve Krug’s “Don’t Make Me Think” … http://brad.me/1pot03u http://brad.me/1pot03u