4 ms·
I disagree. Your statement that regulators give a due weight to important priorities of a democratic society in theory is definitely true. However, regulatory c
by vdaniuk 13y ago
I disagree. Your statement that regulators give a due weight to important priorities of a democratic society in theory is definitely true. However, regulatory capture is very real and I would hypothesize that majority of regulators are serving special interests, not community interests.
And, yes, political special interests are rarely a main reason for regulatory capture. However, business interests are much more influential.
I am at loss why would you use inflammatory language like "bravado", "tropes", "hilarious" and simultaneously criticize Cheskys comments for being counter-productive.
- hapless 13y agoIt's not impossible for it to be both. Special-interest hotel owners AND average citizens both have excellent reasons to see illegal hotels stamped out. As a member of the community at stake, I applaud Albany for pursuing AirBNB's customer lists. I want to see heightened enforcement, not compromise. So far, I'm very pleased with my elected officials on this one.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]