3 ms·
> If they de-duplicated the data (as Zediva did), they'd certainly save a lot on storage and hardware costs, but they'd no longer be protected by this legal pre
by shasta 12y ago
> If they de-duplicated the data (as Zediva did), they'd certainly save a lot on storage and hardware costs, but they'd no longer be protected by this legal precedent.
This should be a clue to the supremes that this is bad law.
- grrowl 12y agoI wonder what the difference would be having the data logically duplicated — as different files — which was then deduplicated at the filesystem level?