3 ms·
I'm not convinced many software people have the right to get too righteous about this, and the fact is many of our systems that do work do so because someone at
by fidotron 13y ago
I'm not convinced many software people have the right to get too righteous about this, and the fact is many of our systems that do work do so because someone at MS, Apple or in the open source community wasted some of their lives swearing at someone's drivers.
Frankly anything close to hardware, up to and through the driver layer, has a real tendency to barely perform as required. It really seems like if it works enough to show someone it looks like it's working they stop, but we've all seen this attitude applied to higher levels of the software stack, except there it's easier to deal with.
The single most telling gadget here is the Chromecast, which successfully nullifies most of the point of smart TVs for <$40, while providing a user experience none of the TV makers got close to.
- logfromblammo 13y agoMy anecdotal experience is that companies that have grown large based on the sale of hardware are attempting to integrate new technical features into their hardware to remain competitive, but they are completely unwilling to pay for people with primarily software-writing experience. The auto manufacturers, in particular, seem to expect that I should be paid about 2/3 my current salary to physically relocate and then work 45-hour weeks for them, if they even have any software jobs in the US at all. To them, writing the software is like adding an extra cup holder.