This seems to contradict r > g . Inequality results in investment, which shifts wealth from the g part of the economy to the r part, due to a lower propensity t

This seems to contradict r > g . Inequality results in investment, which shifts wealth from the g part of the economy to the r part, due to a lower propensity to consume among the wealthy. Or are there second order effects that the reviews (I haven't read the book) don't discuss?