i think 'fn' is too much minimalism.. better 'fun' or even 'func' .. but maybe they wanted to distinguish the sintax from Go's 'func' int -> int (ok) str -> s

i think 'fn' is too much minimalism.. better 'fun' or even 'func' .. but maybe they wanted to distinguish the sintax from Go's 'func' int -> int (ok) str -> string but anyway.. nothing that can prevent someone to enjoy the language.. but the 'fn' for me is the most odd.. getting used to it