4 ms·
One of the interesting things that's changed some since that article was written has been the advent of truly itsy-bitsy sensors, for instance on cell phone cam
by jwise0 12y ago
One of the interesting things that's changed some since that article was written has been the advent of truly itsy-bitsy sensors, for instance on cell phone cameras. Sony, OmniVision, and Aptina are all making sensors on the scale of 1/3", with pixel sizes as small as 1.1µm; the upshot of this is that the electrons wells for these pixels are fantastically tiny, and saturate well below 2,000 electrons.
This means that even on a bright, sunny day, with brilliant opportunities to pour light into the sensor while maintaining short exposure times, we /still/ can't get as much light in as we want, because if we do, we'll saturate the pixels -- and no amount of lowering the analog gain in the readout circuitry will recover the electrons that spilled out of the wells. So, we end up with shot noise as a dominating factor for cell phone images, even in "perfect" conditions.
As we cram more pixels into sensors, noise reduction -- in many different modes -- will become an important battleground in which image sensor and SoC vendors will have to compete. Glad to see it getting some attention :-)