Right, that makes sense. I'm totally okay with strongly-worded debate over Rand's philosophy; she was (intentionally) inflammatory in a lot of cases. But Salo

Right, that makes sense. I'm totally okay with strongly-worded debate over Rand's philosophy; she was (intentionally) inflammatory in a lot of cases. But Salon's piece was ... well ... so much of a strawman that I really didn't understand how the author could characterise Rand's work in that way.