Previous comment used the term legally guilty. You then referenced Jimmy Carr as an example and used the words guilty inferring legal and moral guilt. He was

Previous comment used the term legally guilty. You then referenced Jimmy Carr as an example and used the words guilty inferring legal and moral guilt. He was guilty of neither but he had a public persona to protect and admit wrongdoing where none existed. If subsequent legislation attempts to limit TAS with the "fair admittance" rule of checking the box it has no retrospective bearing on the conduct of Jimmy Carr.