5 ms·
See also http://idlewords.com/2003/12/100_years_of_turbulence.htm http://idlewords.com/2003/12/100_years_of_turbulence.htm, by HN-banned author and entrepreneur
by zachbeane 12y ago
See also http://idlewords.com/2003/12/100_years_of_turbulence.htm http://idlewords.com/2003/12/100_years_of_turbulence.htm, by HN-banned author and entrepreneur Maciej Cegłowski.
- flexie 12y agoHN-banned? Why? How? By whom? When?
- JanezStupar 12y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4108008 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4108008 The whole affair is really sad. Especially due to high quality of Maciej's blog.
- arjie 12y agoInteresting. So that's the story of the origin of lobste.rs.
- username223 12y agoPersonal animosity, I imagine: http://www.idlewords.com/2005/04/dabblers_and_blowhards.htm http://www.idlewords.com/2005/04/dabblers_and_blowhards.htm
- shiven 12y agoWhat-the-wha? The creator of pinboard.in, an awesome bookmarking site, is banned from HN? How? Why? Link?
- JasonFruit 12y agoThat article is painfully flawed, though its point remains valid. What makes Alberto Santos-Dumont, a dedicated experimenter with a positive genius for simple solutions to baffling problems, a "one-man freakshow"? The author never explains, and it's not obvious to the reader. The author's dismissive analysis of the innovations of the Wright Flyer minimizes its advantages and inflates its idiosyncrasies beyond any sense of scale — and for what purpose? His frivolous distortion of fact does nothing to enhance his point.
- JasonFruit 12y agoUsually if I'm downvoted I understand why, but in this case I'm baffled. Can anyone help me understand why this wasn't considered a useful contribution to the discussion?
- dang 12y agoMaciej isn't banned and he's welcome back anytime.
- tptacek 12y agoMaciej was banned, though, and left immediately when that happened, like many reasonable people would. Mistakes happen. I don't think there's much drama to mine here.
- dang 12y agoOh I know, and I wasn't implying otherwise. (It struck me as a big misunderstanding, though I don't know all the details.) My point is, he's not banned and he's welcome. The comment upthread was at best ambiguous on this, so I felt obliged to say something.
- tptacek 12y agoI think I misread your comment, and also that we are probably totally agreed about Maciej. :)