I get the point you are making, but confidence intervals are completely the wrong solution. They do NOT mean what you probably think they mean (where "you" is a

I get the point you are making, but confidence intervals are completely the wrong solution. They do NOT mean what you probably think they mean (where "you" is a generalized "you the reader"). http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/inpress/HoekstraEtAlPBR.pdf http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/inpress/HoekstraEtAlPBR.pdf Credible intervals are probably what you want. A lot of the time people misunderstand confidence intervals and treat them like credible intervals. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credible_interval http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credible_interval