> Certainly, it's technically inaccurate to cite "First Amendment" > rights universally, as that's only a restriction on government. But > the "free speech"

> Certainly, it's technically inaccurate to cite "First Amendment" > rights universally, as that's only a restriction on government. But > the "free speech" is distinct: you can certainly cite your "right to > free speech" in cases that have nothing to do with government. Yes you can bring up unrelated concepts in any discussion. That does not mean that people have to take you seriously or that you will not sound comically ignorant. pg did not consult me when he picked dang for the HN moderator. Can I cite the 26th amendment and demand that pg consider my vote for rdl? I think we should just chalk this up to someone had a bad day at erratasec and leave it at that.