3 ms·
This is fascinating, but I feel that I'm missing some terminology and concepts. I wonder if you could explain in more detail and clarify the terms? So, the atr
by chiph 13y ago
This is fascinating, but I feel that I'm missing some terminology and concepts. I wonder if you could explain in more detail and clarify the terms?
So, the atrium was (say) 80 feet tall, with the sky bridges every 20 feet. So one at 20, 40, and 60 feet. If the continuous rod that had been specified in design was used, it'd be a little longer than 60 feet long (80 foot ceiling, lowest bridge 60 feet below that, plus a another foot or so to make room for fasteners).
That would mean that the middle bridge would have to have had the nuts spun along 40 feet (either from the top or bottom) and the nuts for the topmost and bottom-most bridge would have to be spun along 20 feet of thread. But before you could put the topmost nut on, you'd have to support the rod as you placed it through the box-section beams for the middle bridge. And then do the same for the topmost beam. And then lift it all so that the top end of the rod could be secured to the ceiling.
And this wouldn't have been one rod at a time -- you'd have to do the same for all dozen or more rods at the same time. Nightmare from a construction schedule standpoint.
- vonmoltke 13y agoMy understanding of the incident also is that 60+ foot rods didn't, and still don't, exist as regular items. They would have needed to be custom-made, further hitting cost and schedule.
- joeframbach 13y agoCould something like this be used (at a large scale) to "extend" multiple shorter segments of rod? http://www.pl-259.com/nuts%20adapt%203%208%20to%201%204%20x%2020.JPG http://www.pl-259.com/nuts%20adapt%203%208%20to%201%204%20x%...
- wiredfool 13y agoYes. Couplers would work(1). You'd probably want jam nuts as well, just so things don't back out on you. 1. There may be problems with that approach. IANAPE. They would be different problems than actually caused the failure.