4 ms·
I still prefer OVH.com http://www.ovh.com/us/vps/vps-classic.xml http://www.ovh.com/us/vps/vps-classic.xml for $7 you get: 2 cores 2GB RAM for 10$ you get: 3
by __xtrimsky 13y ago
I still prefer OVH.com
http://www.ovh.com/us/vps/vps-classic.xml http://www.ovh.com/us/vps/vps-classic.xml
for $7 you get:
2 cores
2GB RAM
for 10$ you get:
3 cores
4GB RAM
They don't have SSD, but SSD doesn't do everything, I prefer more ram.
EDIT: If some of you don't know OVH, it's because its new in America, but its not some cheap company, it's a European company that is very successful there. And just recently created a datacenter in North America. (I used to live in France, and have known them for some years).
- giulianob 13y agoCan you run https://github.com/mgutz/vpsbench https://github.com/mgutz/vpsbench and see how the performance is to compare?
- __xtrimsky 13y agoI have the 7$ VPS, here is the result: _04/17/2014 - VMPLAN - DATACENTER - OS - AUTHOR_ ``` CPU model: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4284 Number of cores: 2 CPU frequency: 3000.000 MHz Total amount of RAM: 2048 MB Total amount of swap: 128 MB System uptime: 14 days, 13:31, I/O speed: 75.4 MB/s Bzip 25MB: 7.44s Download 100MB file: 13.0MB/s ```
- gingerlime 13y agovpsbench on a 2Gb fresh Linode in Dallas ``` CPU model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz Number of cores: 2 CPU frequency: 2800.050 MHz Total amount of RAM: 1993 MB Total amount of swap: 511 MB System uptime: 0 min, I/O speed: 811 MB/s Bzip 25MB: 4.93s Download 100MB file: 19.1MB/s ```
- abronte 13y agoI have the 4gb vmware vps (http://www.ovh.com/us/vps/vps-cloud.xml http://www.ovh.com/us/vps/vps-cloud.xml) _04/17/2014 - VMPLAN - DATACENTER - OS - AUTHOR_ ``` CPU model: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4386 Number of cores: 4 CPU frequency: 3100.000 MHz Total amount of RAM: 3943 MB Total amount of swap: 1998 MB System uptime: 10 days, 2:25, I/O speed: 169 MB/s Bzip 25MB: 5.34s Download 100MB file: 15.8MB/s ```
- mappu 13y agoNeat script! Here are some low-end results for comparison. BuyVM 128MB ram, 15GB disk, 15USD/year CPU model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz Number of cores: 1 CPU frequency: 2266.746 MHz Total amount of RAM: 128 MB Total amount of swap: 128 MB System uptime: 39 days, 22:35, I/O speed: 89.9 MB/s Bzip 25MB: 12.89s Download 100MB file: 50.0MB/s QuickPacket: 128MB ram, 20GB disk, 15USD/year CPU model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3470 @ 2.93GHz Number of cores: 1 CPU frequency: 2933.228 MHz Total amount of RAM: 128 MB Total amount of swap: 128 MB System uptime: 48 days, 6:07, I/O speed: 129 MB/s Bzip 25MB: 6.40s Download 100MB file: 1.14MB/s A good aggregator for low-end deals is lowendstock.com .
- kh_hk 13y agoSpeaking of OVH, their catalog on low-end dedicated servers (when available) is quite nice too http://www.kimsufi.com http://www.kimsufi.com
- hadoukenio 13y agoJust be aware that OVH is using OpenVZ whereas both Linode and DO are using KVM. That's a big difference if it matters to you
- porker 13y agoI don't understand the difference between OpenVZ, KVM and all the other virtualization providers. Is it that some are much faster than others?
- vidyesh 13y agoOpenVZ is an OS level virtualization. The OS is partitioned and assigned resources, so the plans show two resources viz. dedicated and burst. The dedicated are the guaranteed resources to the server and burst are the remaining which are unused by the complete system and released to your server when required ( on load ). So a single OpenVZ VPS is actually running on resources which are shared with another VPS box. Mostly the burstable resource is the RAM which is borrowed from another VPS box when its not in use and your VPS box needs it. On the other hand, KVM is hardware virtualization. The main OS simulates hardware for another OS to run on top of it. It fairly distributes all the resources. It does not have burst resources but it guarantees the dedicated resources. Essentially this means the plan which you see its 100% with you and is never shared with anyone. This also means on load you will not get extra ( burstable ) RAM out of it. Guaranteed streamline performance is observed in KVM but value per dollar and efficient use of the complete hardware is observed in OpenVZ. tl;dr : OpenVZ is OS virtualization. Resources are variable and are shared with other(few) users on the same server as and when required. Dedicated resources are guaranteed but they could be shared with others and your box can borrow when others are idle. KVM is hardware virtualization. All the resources are dedicated to you and only you. None is shared nor you get the shared bonus if required to your server. Dedicated resources are guaranteed.
- porker 12y agoThanks, that's an awesome answer!
- 12y ago