4 ms·
It's not so much the statements as the fact that she specifically helped get bills passed that enabled warrantless wiretapping. There was no concern for Constit
by nathas 13y ago
It's not so much the statements as the fact that she specifically helped get bills passed that enabled warrantless wiretapping. There was no concern for Constitutional law.
Personally, I don't think people change much. I doubt she thinks she did the wrong thing, and would not hesitate to do it again if she went back in time.
- tjaerv 13y agoAnd in case she happens to be a sociopath, as so many politicians are, she wouldn't even fully grok what "wrong" means in the first place.
- twoodfin 13y agoWhich bills are you talking about?
- jkmcf 13y agoOur constitutional lawyer president also doesn’t have a concern for the Constitution. Disclaimer: voted for him 2008